Skip to Main Content Banner

Conspiracy Theories

Evaluating Your Sources

As you search, you should evaluate the sources you find. Books, articles, and websites are created by people with a wide range of opinions, education, and purposes for writing. You could also find sources that are outdated, inaccurate, or just not useful for your research.

There are many strategies for evaluating your sources, but one that we as librarians recommend is the SIFT Method. SIFT is an acronym that represents four criteria that should be on your checklist as you read through a source. As you read sources, keep the following things in mind: Stop before you read,  Investigate the Source, Find Better Coverage, and Trace Claims, Quotes, and Media back to the Original Context.

https://mikecaulfield.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/sift-infographic.png

 

 

 

 

 

The SIFT method was created by Mike Caulfield. All SIFT information on this page is adapted from his materials with a CC BY 4.0 license.

STOP

Be aware of your emotional response to the headline or information in the article. Headlines are often meant to get clicks, and will do so by causing the reader to have a strong emotional response. Before sharing, consider:

  • What you already know about the topic. ​
  • What you know about the source. Do you know it's reputation?

Don't use the source until you have found out more about its content, its creator, and its publisher.

 

INVESTIGATE  

The quality of your research is determined by the sources you use. Investigate a source by leaving that web page and looking for information about the source elsewhere. Take a moment to look up the author and source publishing the information.

  • What can you find about the author/website creators? ​
  • What is their mission? Do they have vested interests? ​Would their assessment be biased?
  • Do they have authority in the area?​

 

FIND

Sometimes it's less important to know about the source and more important to assess their claim. What that means is, we can try and find the information we're looking at in other sources. This helps to both verify whether the information is true and to find a better, or more trusted, source of coverage.

"Trusted coverage" can mean:

  • What other coverage is available on the same topic? Most big news stories that are true get covered by multiple major news outlets.
  • A track record of accurate reporting
  • A reputation for minimizing bias in reporting

 

TRACE

Many times the information we encounter is stripped of its context, which can distort its meaning. It's important to trace claims, quotes, and media back to their original source so that you can understand the context and ensure the information is being presented accurately. 

Click through the links to follow the claims to the original source of information. Open up the original reporting sources listed in a bibliography if present

  • Was the claim, quote, or media fairly represented?
  • Does the extracted information support the original claims in the research? ​
  • Is information being cherry-picked to support an agenda or a bias?​
  • Is information being taken out of context?​

After you've found the original claim, quote, finding, or news story, ask yourself if it was fairly and accurately represented in the media that you initially came across. 

Debunking Conspiracy Theories

The following books are great places to find strategies and tips for combatting conspiracy thinking, hoaxes, frauds, and more.

Internet Resources

Thankfully, there are numerous resources and advice to combat conspiracies and misinformation available online. Many of them are created by librarians and professors who've studied the problem of bad information for a long time. 

Library Help

  •  
  • Call: 801.863.8840
  • Text: 801.290.8123