Most scholarly articles follow the structure seen in the image above. Understanding this structure will help you be a more efficient reader and understand which parts of the article are most useful to you as a researcher.
It may seem counterintuitive, but you don't need to read scholarly articles from start to finish—in fact, we recommend you skim and read articles out of order! As you're choosing which articles are most relevant to your research, try reading in this order:
This allows you to discover what the researchers learned through their study and decide if this is relevant to your own research, before you go back and spend more time looking at their methods and data.
The Discussion, Findings, and Conclusions sections are typically the sections you should paraphrase or quote in the literature review section of your research proposal. These sections include the main ideas learned through the research study, and so will be useful in your literature review to demonstrate what's already known about your topic or the current trends.
Be cautious about referencing information found in the Introduction section of articles. There's a good chance the author is actually referencing previous research, in which case you would want to use the citation to track down the original article and cite that instead.
In previous classes you may have glossed over the Methods section of articles, but this section is extremely useful in a Research Methods class and for your research proposal! This is the section that describes how the authors designed and carried out the study—what population was included, how they collected and analyzed their data, and other methods critical to their research process.
This means the Methods section of articles can give you ideas for your own research proposal! As you read articles for your literature review, keep track of or highlight the methods used in each study. When it comes time to design your own proposed study, you can refer back to these methods and build on prior works' designs.
Primary source articles describe original research studies; these are also known as empirical articles. Primary source articles are written by the people who conducted the research and mark the first time the research has been published. Secondary sources usually comment on or review primary sources and demonstrate trends over time. Primary sources containing original research start a scholarly conversation, whereas secondary sources continue that conversation through discussion, summaries, and commentary.
You'll most often use primary/empirical articles in your research papers, but secondary sources can be a great way to introduce yourself to a topic or to find a collection of articles related to a topic.
Primary/Empirical Sources | Secondary Sources | |
---|---|---|
Definition | Sources that present original research, written by the people who conducted the research. | Sources that comment on, summarize, review, or discuss primary sources. |
Common Formats | Original research articles in scholarly journals, conference papers, dissertations. | Literature review articles in journals, magazine or newspaper articles summarizing a research study, handbooks with literature review chapters. |
Examples |
An article detailing how one psychological study was designed, how they analyzed the data, and presenting their original findings. |
An article compiling various literature published on a psychological topic over a five-year period, summarizing results from the studies and making commentary on trends. |
Clues to Look For | Look for a section in the article labeled Method or Methodology—if it's a primary source, this section will describe how they conducted their experiment or research study. | Look for the word "review" or the phrase "literature review" in the title of the article or in the article's abstract. A Method or Methodology section may also describe the steps they took to compile their literature review. Newspaper and magazine articles will almost always be secondary sources reviewing or summarizing primary sources. |